Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
9.
Australas J Dermatol ; 61(3): e351-e353, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32141075

RESUMO

Chlorpromazine is known to produce both systemic phototoxic and photoallergic reactions. However, it may also cause photoallergic contact dermatitis and, albeit exceptionally, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). We present a series of photoallergic contact dermatitis and ACD to chlorpromazine diagnosed at a tertiary centre cutaneous allergy unit between 1980 and 2019.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Clorpromazina/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Fotoalérgica/etiologia , Adulto , Queilite/induzido quimicamente , Pálpebras , Dermatoses Faciais/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Dedos , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 36(4): 540-541, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30838689

RESUMO

Chlorhexidine is one of the most widely used antiseptics in our environment. Allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine is common in adults, but is quite rare in the pediatric population. Its diagnosis is important because it can mimic other dermatoses common during childhood, and it can also lead to acute immediate hypersensitivity reactions following successive exposures.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Clorexidina/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/etiologia , Administração Tópica , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Amostragem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(1): 5-8, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2012, a consensus was reached regarding a baseline photopatch test series on the basis of the results of a European multicentre study. OBJECTIVES: To describe experience with the European photopatch test series. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 116 patients tested with the European photopatch test series between 2014 and 2016 was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-five positive photopatch test reactions in 25 subjects were recorded, most commonly caused by the topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, and etofenomate. Organic ultraviolet (UV) absorbers constituted the second main category of agents eliciting positive photopatch test reactions. Among UV absorbers, benozophenone-3 and octocrylene were the most frequent photoallergens. UV absorbers that have been introduced more recently rarely elicited positive photopatch test reactions. Positive patch test reactions were less commonly observed than positive photopatch test reactions, namely, 21 reactions in 14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We present the largest clinical experience with the European photopatch test baseline series hitherto reported. The results are similar to those underlying the above consensus process, reaffirming the usefulness of this series.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Fotoalérgica/etiologia , Protetores Solares/efeitos adversos , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benzofenonas/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Ácido Flufenâmico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Flufenâmico/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Cetoprofeno/efeitos adversos , Cetoprofeno/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Trometamina/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Pediatrics ; 142(3)2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30082451

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on optimal treatment duration for propranolol in infantile hemangioma (IH). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral propranolol solution administered for a minimum of 6 months up to a maximum of 12 months of age in high-risk IH. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted in patients aged 35 to 150 days with high-risk IH in 10 hospitals between 2015 and 2017. The study comprised a 6-month initial treatment period (ITP) plus continuation up to 12 months of age if complete success was not achieved, a follow-up, and a retreatment period. Patients received oral propranolol twice daily (3 mg/kg per day). The primary end point was the success rate at the end of the ITP. Furthermore, the persistence of IH response and efficacy of retreatment was evaluated. RESULTS: The success rate after 6 months of treatment was 47%, increasing to 76% at the end of the ITP. Of the patients who achieved success, 68% sustained success for 3 months without treatment, and 24% required retreatment. Of the 8 patients who were retreated, 7 achieved success. Adverse events, reported by 80% of patients, were mild, which were expected in this population or known propranolol side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Oral propranolol administered beyond 6 months and up to 12 months of age meaningfully increases the success rate in high-risk IH. Success was sustained in most patients up to 3 months after stopping treatment. Retreatment was efficacious, and the safety profile satisfactory.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Hemangioma/tratamento farmacológico , Propranolol/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 88(6): 309-314, jun. 2018. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-176954

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: El eccema de manos es una forma frecuente de eccema en adultos. Su diagnóstico en ocasiones es complejo debido a la existencia de diferentes clasificaciones diagnósticas. Existen pocos trabajos que estudien el eccema de manos y su clasificación en niños. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se ha identificado a 389 niños entre 0 y 16 años remitidos a la Unidad de Alergia Cutánea de nuestro servicio para estudio con pruebas epicutáneas en el periodo 1996-2016. De entre todos los casos se han seleccionado 42 casos con dermatitis localizada exclusivamente en la mano (10,8% de todos los niños remitidos). En todos los casos se realizaron pruebas epicutáneas parchando la batería estándar, así como baterías adicionales en función de la sospecha clínica. Se recogieron datos epidemiológicos (edad, sexo, antecedentes de dermatitis atópica...), así como clínicos (localización de las lesiones). RESULTADOS: De los 42 niños remitidos con dermatitis de la mano, 25 (60,5%) eran niñas y 17 (40,5%) niños. La edad media de los pacientes con dermatitis de la mano fue de 10,6 ± 3,9 años. El diagnóstico definitivo tras la realización de pruebas epicutáneas fue dermatitis atópica en 15 casos, dermatitis alérgica de contacto en 14 pacientes, eccema endógeno vesiculoso en 6 casos, eccema endógeno hiperqueratósico en 5 casos y dermatitis irritativa de contacto en 2 casos. Los alérgenos detectados más frecuentes fueron tiomersal (9 casos), niquel (5 casos), mercurio (5 casos) y cobalto (4 casos). CONCLUSIÓN: El eccema de manos es una entidad frecuente en niños. La causa más frecuente es la dermatitis atópica, aunque no son infrecuentes los casos de dermatitis alérgica de contacto que se manifiestan como eccema de manos. Todo niño con eccema de manos en el que se sospeche una causa alérgica debe ser remitido para realización de pruebas epicutáneas


INTRODUCTION: Hand eczema is a frequent disease in adults. Diagnosing the cause of hand eczema is difficult due to different classifications. There is lack of evidence on hand eczema and its causes in children. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 389 children between 0 and 16 years were identified between 1996 and 2016, from whom 42 (10.8%) with exclusively hand eczema were selected. In all cases a standard battery of epicutaneous patch tests was performed, as well as additional batteries depending on the clinical suspicion. The clinical and epidemiological features of these children were recorded and compared against children with eczema in other locations. RESULTS: The 42 children with hand eczema included 25 (60.5%) girls, and 17 (40.5%) boys, with a mean age of 10.6 +- 3.9 years, and did not differ from that of children with eczema in other locations. The definitive diagnosis after patch-testing was Atopic Dermatitis in 15 cases, Allergic Contact Dermatitis in 14 patients, Endogenous Vesiculous Eczema in 6 cases, Endogenous Hyperkeratotic Eczema in 5 cases, and Irritant Contact Dermatitis in 2 cases. The most frequent allergens detected were thiomersal (9 cases), nickel (5 cases), mercury (5 cases), and cobalt (4 cases). CONCLUSION: Hand eczema is a common condition in children. The most common cause is atopic dermatitis, although cases of allergic contact dermatitis manifesting as hand eczema are not uncommon. Any child with eczema of hands in whom an allergic cause is suspected should be referred for patch- testing


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Estudo Observacional , Eczema/imunologia , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Dermatoses da Mão/imunologia , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Testes Cutâneos
16.
Int J Mol Sci ; 19(4)2018 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29642415

RESUMO

Biallelic mutations in RECQL4 gene, a caretaker of the genome, cause Rothmund-Thomson type-II syndrome (RTS-II) and confer increased cancer risk if they damage the helicase domain. We describe five families exemplifying clinical and allelic heterogeneity of RTS-II, and report the effect of pathogenic RECQL4 variants by in silico predictions and transcripts analyses. Complete phenotype of patients #39 and #42 whose affected siblings developed osteosarcoma correlates with their c.[1048_1049del], c.[1878+32_1878+55del] and c.[1568G>C;1573delT], c.[3021_3022del] variants which damage the helicase domain. Literature survey highlights enrichment of these variants affecting the helicase domain in patients with cancer outcome raising the issue of strict oncological surveillance. Conversely, patients #29 and #19 have a mild phenotype and carry, respectively, the unreported homozygous c.3265G>T and c.3054A>G variants, both sparing the helicase domain. Finally, despite matching several criteria for RTS clinical diagnosis, patient #38 is heterozygous for c.2412_2414del; no pathogenic CNVs out of those evidenced by high-resolution CGH-array, emerged as contributors to her phenotype.


Assuntos
Mutação , Fenótipo , Síndrome de Rothmund-Thomson/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Criança , Feminino , Homozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Linhagem , RecQ Helicases/genética , RecQ Helicases/metabolismo , Síndrome de Rothmund-Thomson/patologia
17.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 88(6): 309-314, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28838840

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hand eczema is a frequent disease in adults. Diagnosing the cause of hand eczema is difficult due to different classifications. There is lack of evidence on hand eczema and its causes in children. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 389 children between 0 and 16 years were identified between 1996 and 2016, from whom 42 (10.8%) with exclusively hand eczema were selected. In all cases a standard battery of epicutaneous patch tests was performed, as well as additional batteries depending on the clinical suspicion. The clinical and epidemiological features of these children were recorded and compared against children with eczema in other locations. RESULTS: The 42 children with hand eczema included 25 (60.5%) girls, and 17 (40.5%) boys, with a mean age of 10.6 +- 3.9 years, and did not differ from that of children with eczema in other locations. The definitive diagnosis after patch-testing was Atopic Dermatitis in 15 cases, Allergic Contact Dermatitis in 14 patients, Endogenous Vesiculous Eczema in 6 cases, Endogenous Hyperkeratotic Eczema in 5 cases, and Irritant Contact Dermatitis in 2 cases. The most frequent allergens detected were thiomersal (9 cases), nickel (5 cases), mercury (5 cases), and cobalt (4 cases). CONCLUSION: Hand eczema is a common condition in children. The most common cause is atopic dermatitis, although cases of allergic contact dermatitis manifesting as hand eczema are not uncommon. Any child with eczema of hands in whom an allergic cause is suspected should be referred for patch- testing.


Assuntos
Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eczema/imunologia , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/imunologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
18.
Dermatol Online J ; 24(10)2018 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30677821

RESUMO

The development of new biological drugs for the treatment of advanced oncological processes or severe inflammatory diseases brings with it the appearance of new adverse effects. Vedolizumab, an α4ß7 integrin inhibitor antibody, is approved for induction and maintenance therapy in both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. We report a case of severe acneiform eruption induced by vedolizumab in a 17-year-old woman with ulcerative colitis.


Assuntos
Erupções Acneiformes/induzido quimicamente , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Erupção por Droga/etiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/induzido quimicamente , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos
20.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 34(5): 535-539, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28730653

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Footwear dermatitis is a form of contact dermatitis resulting from exposure to shoes. There have been only small studies regarding foot contact dermatitis in children. The present study was undertaken to define the prevalence and epidemiologic and clinical features of shoe dermatitis in children. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of all children referred for patch testing between 1996 and 2015. Children with dermatitis limited to the feet were selected. RESULTS: We collected data from 389 children younger than 16 years, 52 of whom (13.4%) were referred with dermatitis exclusively on the feet. Diagnosis after patch testing was allergic contact dermatitis in 23 children (44.2%), atopic eczema in 12 (23.1%), juvenile plantar dermatosis in 8 (15.4%), dyshidrotic eczema in 6 (11.5%), irritant contact dermatitis in 2 (3.8%), and tinea pedis in 1 (1.9%). The most frequent allergens were potassium dichromate, thimerosal, cobalt chloride, mercapto mix, colophonium, mercury, and nickel(II) sulfate. CONCLUSION: Allergic contact dermatitis caused by footwear is a common cause of foot dermatitis in children. Children with foot dermatitis should be referred for patch testing when an allergic origin is suspected.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatoses do Pé/epidemiologia , Sapatos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Alérgenos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , , Dermatoses do Pé/diagnóstico , Dermatoses do Pé/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...